Upper West Lothian Question
The historic vote in favour of a 100% elected House of Lords raises the prospect of the West Lothian Question being replicated in the upper chamber.
As you will know Westminster is a bicameral parliament which means that legislation is scrutinised by a secondary revising chamber. Due to our skewed constitution this set up results in English-only domestic legislation being scrutinised by Scottish and Welsh Lords - people like Neil Kinnock and Lord Falconer for example. Scotland, by contrast, has a unicameral system, meaning English Lords do not get to subject Scottish legislation to scrutiny.
In the past this glaring constitutional
anomaly unfairness has been dismissed by Government ministers and the Department for Constitutional Affairs. They tell us that although the lower chamber is elected on a territorial basis the upper chamber is appointed and full of individuals rather than representatives of particular nations, regions or territories. By this logic there is no comparison with the West Lothian Question that occasionally bedevils the House of Commons because the House of Lords has no territorial basis and their Lordships are not territorial beasts. Complete bollocks of course, but that's their logic.
However, this logic could fall down with an elected House of Lords. Why should Lords elected by Scots get to vote on English legislation? That's the question that I will be asking.
In all probability the Government won't care what I say, but the Conservative Party just might. If the Tories are proposing English Votes on English Matters for the House of Commons then it stands to reason that the same principle should apply to a directly elected House of Lords.
If a geographical factor is introduced into the Lords, as proposed by Hazel Blears, then things could get very ugly indeed. But it really doesn't matter whether the Lords is directly elected or indirectly elected, or elected proportionately, because somewhere, at sometime, Scots will be electing yet more Scots to vote on English legislation.
Trackback URL for this post:
I'm the proud owner of a letter from Mark Harper, in which he states "There is no link between the Barnett Formula and the West Lothian question".
Yesterday he wasn't daft enough to put such a view on the Hansard record:
Alan Beith (Berwick-upon-Tweed,
Having now actually read Clarke's report (pdf), instead of just the accompanying press reports and interviews, I just thought I'd congratulate myself for being the first to raise the Upper West Lothian Question which was addressed in Clarke's paper:
I have a slightly disingenuous attitude towards House of Lords reform. I fully support the proposal to elect the Lords by proportional representation on a regional [territorial] basis precisely because such a system would undermine the House of Commons a
Simon Heffer has written an interesting piece in the Telegraph outlining Vernon Bognador's concerns over the Coalition Government's constitutional reforms. Prof Bognador is 'alarmed' by the changes that are afoot and believes that 'they would shut the Br
"Could a future Prime Minister sit in an elected House of Lords?", asked Norman Lamont on Monday.
The answer that came back was "No".
Concern was expressed that proportional representation could confer upon the Lords greater democractic legitimacy than
The Coalition Government has suffered its first defeat.
In an obscure procedural move, peers backed a motion that blocked the second reading of the Local Government Bill....
Peers backed Lord Howarth's motion by 154 to 150.
Yes, that's Baron Howarth of
The Guardian has published in full the Government's proposed Lords Reforms.
Jack Straw's new Lords would be elected on a regional basis.
The Government proposes 12 electoral regions which will act as multimember electoral constituencies. England will be
In May 2005 I wrote to Oliver Heald MP, the then Shadow Secretary of State for Constitutional Affairs, to suggest that the Conservative policy of English Votes on English Laws was a crock of shit that hadn't been thought through.
Many thanks for your mes
- Charles Kennedy accuses the Conservatives of stoking up English nationalism
- Ed Miliband may not be as daft as Sturgeon thinks
- Prediction: The slumbering lion of English nationalism will finally roar
- Do the Scots oppose an English national holiday?
- The Tories’ English manifesto is to be welcomed
- Might Ed Miliband soon change his tune?
- The 2015 UKIP Manifesto still too British
- If a Constitutional Convention is right for the Union why is it not right for England?